Intimidating a witness rcw

06 Aug

The Governor, California State Legislature and the Supreme Court of California lead the three branches of government in the State of California. The main source of state law is the California Constitution and the state codes, as interpreted by state and federal courts, including the California Supreme Court, California Courts of Appeal, U. A conditional threat to injure property in the future is within this definition. Use of the first bracketed phrase, which is the language of RCW 9A.04.110(27)(a), is error in a robbery case because that statutory definition refers to threat to do injury in the future. See the Comment to WPIC 86.02 (Threatening to Bomb or Injure Property—Elements). Hansen, 122 Wn.2d 712, 862 P.2d 117 (1993)); threats to bomb a government building (State v. Intimidating a Witness A person is guilty of intimidating a witness if a person, by use of a threat against a current or prospective witness, attempts to: (1) influence the testimony of that person; (2) induce that person to elude legal process summoning him or her to testify; or (3) induce that person to absent himself or herself from such proceedings.

of the Revised Code, other than section 3734.18 of the Revised Code, that relates to hazardous wastes, shall do either of the following:(1) With another person or persons, plan or aid in planning the commission of any of the specified offenses; (2) Agree with another person or persons that one or more of them will engage in conduct that facilitates the commission of any of the specified offenses.testify; or to testify in a manner which acquits the defendant of any crimes.In response, savvy Prosecutors try to protect their witnesses and stack charges by filing Tampering With a Witness and/or Witness Intimidation charges.With regard to the bracketed clause relating to political argument, see the Comment below. Several statutes supplement RCW 9A.04.110 with an additional definition of threat: “to communicate, directly or indirectly, the intent immediately to use force against any person who is present at the time.” See RCW 9A.76.180(3)(a) (intimidating a public servant); RCW 9A.72.160 (intimidating a judge); RCW 9A.72.130 (intimidating a juror); and RCW 9A.72.110 (intimidating a witness). Portions of this instruction may be used with, or as an alternative to, WPIC 115.52 (Intimidating a Witness—Threat—Definition), in combination with WPIC 115.51 (Intimidating a Witness—Threat to Former Witness—Elements). A speaker need not actually intend to carry out a threat in order for the communication to constitute a threat, as long as the speaker objectively knows that the communication constitutes a threat. Kilburn, 151 Wn.2d 36, 48, 84 P.3d 1215 (2004); see also State v.